Comments on: Rewarding social software participation within the corporation http://enterprise20blog.com/2008/09/27/rewarding-social-software-participation-within-the-corporation/ discussing the collaborative enterprise Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:49:08 +0000 hourly 1 By: frogpond » Web 2 Expo Europe - checking out the speakers http://enterprise20blog.com/2008/09/27/rewarding-social-software-participation-within-the-corporation/#comment-347 frogpond » Web 2 Expo Europe - checking out the speakers Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:39:54 +0000 http://blog.enterprise2open.com/?p=46#comment-347 [...] who I’ve seen as well at the Enterprise 2.0 Forum in Cologne (blogged about her talk here, video at enterprise2open). Bio: Suw Charman-Anderson of Strange Attractor is a leading social software expert, specialising [...] [...] who I’ve seen as well at the Enterprise 2.0 Forum in Cologne (blogged about her talk here, video at enterprise2open). Bio: Suw Charman-Anderson of Strange Attractor is a leading social software expert, specialising [...]

]]> By: Martin Koser http://enterprise20blog.com/2008/09/27/rewarding-social-software-participation-within-the-corporation/#comment-342 Martin Koser Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:50:56 +0000 http://blog.enterprise2open.com/?p=46#comment-342 Well, I support the need for activity streams, but it's tricky: As greater transparency of people's contributions kicks in we need mechanisms and ways to deal with - people that are trying to "game the system of reward", i.e. by putting on a "show of noise and fog" without real substance. We need more than a simple "liked this", or "xyz commented x times" in the enterprise for that, given the fact that people might band together to "cheat" - people that are making valuable, yet minor additions that don't show up in the stream of activities. How to reward people that are commenting worthwhile things or finding "stuff" in the first place. Just my 2 cents, I guess there are no easy solutions in the reward system/ adoption space anyway Well, I support the need for activity streams, but it’s tricky: As greater transparency of people’s contributions kicks in we need mechanisms and ways to deal with

- people that are trying to “game the system of reward”, i.e. by putting on a “show of noise and fog” without real substance. We need more than a simple “liked this”, or “xyz commented x times” in the enterprise for that, given the fact that people might band together to “cheat”

- people that are making valuable, yet minor additions that don’t show up in the stream of activities. How to reward people that are commenting worthwhile things or finding “stuff” in the first place.

Just my 2 cents, I guess there are no easy solutions in the reward system/ adoption space anyway

]]> By: Martin Koser http://enterprise20blog.com/2008/09/27/rewarding-social-software-participation-within-the-corporation/#comment-88114 Martin Koser Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:50:56 +0000 http://blog.enterprise2open.com/?p=46#comment-88114 Well, I support the need for activity streams, but it's tricky: As greater transparency of people's contributions kicks in we need mechanisms and ways to deal with - people that are trying to "game the system of reward", i.e. by putting on a "show of noise and fog" without real substance. We need more than a simple "liked this", or "xyz commented x times" in the enterprise for that, given the fact that people might band together to "cheat" - people that are making valuable, yet minor additions that don't show up in the stream of activities. How to reward people that are commenting worthwhile things or finding "stuff" in the first place. Just my 2 cents, I guess there are no easy solutions in the reward system/ adoption space anyway Well, I support the need for activity streams, but it’s tricky: As greater transparency of people’s contributions kicks in we need mechanisms and ways to deal with

- people that are trying to “game the system of reward”, i.e. by putting on a “show of noise and fog” without real substance. We need more than a simple “liked this”, or “xyz commented x times” in the enterprise for that, given the fact that people might band together to “cheat”

- people that are making valuable, yet minor additions that don’t show up in the stream of activities. How to reward people that are commenting worthwhile things or finding “stuff” in the first place.

Just my 2 cents, I guess there are no easy solutions in the reward system/ adoption space anyway

]]> By: frogpond » How to get people actually to use it … http://enterprise20blog.com/2008/09/27/rewarding-social-software-participation-within-the-corporation/#comment-341 frogpond » How to get people actually to use it … Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:16:45 +0000 http://blog.enterprise2open.com/?p=46#comment-341 [...] it then, but since I haven’t got much time on my hands. So I am glad that he stepped in and set up the recorded video footage. Suw was talking about adoption strategies for social software in the enterprise, proceeding from [...] [...] it then, but since I haven’t got much time on my hands. So I am glad that he stepped in and set up the recorded video footage. Suw was talking about adoption strategies for social software in the enterprise, proceeding from [...]

]]>